Page 1 of 1
EQ4800 Firmware upgrade - BMU vs BCU
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2025 11:34 pm
by crazytachikoma
Hi All,
in a eq4800 system, the master is showing bmu 1.14 while slaves 1.15 - there is an upgrade to bmu 1.15 available
bcu is showing 2.005 while 2.010 is available
is it worth upgrading? system is working well
also, should I do the bmu to 1.15 first? or doesn't matter? thanks
Re: EQ4800 Firmware upgrade - BMU vs BCU
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2025 8:40 am
by Dave Foster
It’s not quite the same architecture as master/slave but closest approximation is BMU = Slave, BCU = Master
As a rule i’m a strong believer in if it isn’t broke don’t fix it - the differences here mainly down to low temperature handling/stability and pack balance, arguably worth having those changes.
It’s best to update BCU first, and then BMU (which will be pushed out to all slave batteries)
Re: EQ4800 Firmware upgrade - BMU vs BCU
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:04 am
by crazytachikoma
thanks for clarifying regarding upgrade order mate
low temps aren't a problem here in QLD Australia so I will hold on for now

Re: EQ4800 Firmware upgrade - BMU vs BCU
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:10 am
by Dave Foster
crazytachikoma wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:04 am
low temps aren't a problem here in QLD Australia so I will hold on for now
I did wonder whether you would be, i’d mostly definitely swap you that for a UK winter
