hi
Just found this forum as was looking for help with my system, thanks to Will for setting it up.
thought I would say hello as I've used the battery install guide made by Prasanna. Thank you.
My system
20x 400w panels
FoxESS h1 6.0-E
FoxESS batterys ECS4100
2 x FoxESS CS4100 slaves
(no idea why pics are sideways?)
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 9:48 am
Attachments:
Site Admin
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:56 pm
Site Admin
Nice neat install, welcome!
Community Admin / FoxESS Elite Professional
Buy me a coffee or Book a zoom meeting for remote consultancy
FoxESS Tri Inverter Installation
2 x KH & 1 x H1
24 x HV2600 (62.4kWh)
32 x 490w across 4 arrays
Dual Tesla Household
Heatpump & Low Carbon Housebuild
Buy me a coffee or Book a zoom meeting for remote consultancy
FoxESS Tri Inverter Installation
2 x KH & 1 x H1
24 x HV2600 (62.4kWh)
32 x 490w across 4 arrays
Dual Tesla Household
Heatpump & Low Carbon Housebuild
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:56 pm
Why do people talk about being a "low carbon" household or other entity when the term "carbon" is incorrect?
The chemical you're actually talking about is carbon dioxide - a gas and not carbon which often and also incorrectly, gives the impression of being a dirty, sooty thing and therefore an undesirable product. Not too many however dislike diamonds.
Calling carbon dioxide "carbon" is like calling water "hydrogen" or "oxygen". It isn't. It's water and carbon dioxide is just as it says "on the tin".
All part of the (incorrect) re-education of the masses to fall in line with the globalists.
The chemical you're actually talking about is carbon dioxide - a gas and not carbon which often and also incorrectly, gives the impression of being a dirty, sooty thing and therefore an undesirable product. Not too many however dislike diamonds.
Calling carbon dioxide "carbon" is like calling water "hydrogen" or "oxygen". It isn't. It's water and carbon dioxide is just as it says "on the tin".
All part of the (incorrect) re-education of the masses to fall in line with the globalists.
I think most people have a reasonable idea of what is meant by "low carbon". This is how languages work, they find efficient ways to convey information. There's a general understanding that too much carbon (dioxide) in the atmosphere is a bad thing, and hence being "low (in) carbon (dioxide emissions)" is, in the general sense, desirable.
How truly any given entity, household or anything else actually is "low carbon" is a whole other topic of course.
How truly any given entity, household or anything else actually is "low carbon" is a whole other topic of course.